Geographic Range
Microtus oeconomus
(pronounced e-KON-uh-mus), commonly known as the tundra or root vole, is one of
only four Holarctic rodents and the only species of
Microtus
that is found on all northern continents. In the Nearctic, it is found from the extreme
northern edge of British Columbia northward to the Arctic coast, and from western
Northwest Territories, through Yukon Territory and nearly all of Alaska. It has the
northernmost distribution of any
Microtus
species in North America, with occurrences to around 71°N in Alaska. In the Palearctic,
tundra voles occupy a somewhat broader range, extending from Scandinavia and the Netherlands
in the west, throughout northern Europe and Asia to Siberia in the east, and south
as far as Mongolia.
- Biogeographic Regions
- nearctic
- palearctic
- Other Geographic Terms
- holarctic
Habitat
Microtus oeconomus
inhabits the tundra and taiga biomes and prefers mesic sedge meadows with abundant
cover. It is commonly found along the edges of lakes and streams where this and similar
habitats occur. Although this habitat usually occurs in relative lowlands, tundra
voles are also found in wetter areas of mountainous regions at elevations of up to
2,500 meters. In the Palearctic,
M. oeconomus
is found in a broader range of habitats, commonly inhabiting mixed forest, taiga,
and forest-steppe biomes with similar conditions. Habitat is most strongly selected
on the basis of food quality and amount of cover provided.
- Wetlands
- bog
Physical Description
Microtus oeconomus
is a medium-sized vole and varies in color dorsally from darker brown or grayish
to lighter shades of cinnamon, rusty brown, or ocher. All color variations display
a mixture of black-tipped hairs in the dorsal pelage. Sides are somewhat paler and
the ventral surface is much lighter, from buff or ash gray to white. The tail is slightly
to strongly dichromatic, being darker above and paler below. There is a fair amount
of color variation in the species, which can often be related to habitat and geography.
Tundra voles are generally lighter colored in more open habitats, and have yellow
or grayish tones in tundra or forested habitats, respectfully.
Tundra voles display sexual size dimorphism, with adult males roughly 30% larger than
females. The size and weight of the species is also variable relative to latitude
and geography, especially so in the Palearctic. Individuals in populations at higher
latitudes are generally larger and have proportionally smaller tails as a possible
adaptation to colder temperatures. In addition, insular subspecies are generally larger
than continental counterparts. Weight ranges from 25 to 80 g, with an average around
50 g. Total length ranges from 118 mm in the Old World, to 226 mm in the larger subspecies
found in the New World. The tail is relatively short, generally being less than 30%
of the total length. The name
Microtus
means “small ear” and refers to the short ears hidden in pelage that are a characteristic
common to members of the genus. The dental formula for
M. oeconomus
follows the basic pattern for all
Microtus
: incisors 1/1, canines 0/0, premolars 0/0, molars 3/3.
Microtus oeconomus
maintains a relatively high basal metabolic rate (compared to most rodents) of 12.5
mL O2 per gram of body mass per hour. This is due primarily to the high thermoregulatory
demands of small endothermic mammals in cold environments.
- Other Physical Features
- endothermic
- homoiothermic
- bilateral symmetry
- Sexual Dimorphism
- male larger
Reproduction
Various mating systems have been observed in
Microtus oeconomus
, including promiscuous, multi-partner groups, polygyny, and monogamy. The mating
system adopted is determined primarily by the general spacing patterns of a specific
population, which are in turn influenced by factors such as habitat, season, and population
densities (discussed below). In general, a slightly biased female (57%) to male (43%)
ratio favors a system of polygyny in tundra voles. Accordingly, single-male polygyny
and multi-male promiscuity are the most common systems observed during normal breeding
season. However, facultative monogamy is adopted in isolated territories or patchy
habitats with low densities and can be relatively long-lasting.
- Mating System
- monogamous
- polygynous
- polygynandrous (promiscuous)
Female tundra voles are polyestrous and often produce two to three litters per year.
The breeding season generally lasts from late April to September during years with
peak densities, and is around one to two months shorter in years of low densities.
Winter breeding has been observed very rarely, and is attributed to unusually warm
summers resulting in late fall re-growth.
Litter sizes of
Microtus oeconomus
are relatively large for the genus and usually range from four to eight offspring,
with an average of 6.9. Litter size increases with age of the female, and over-wintered
females are usually much more productive than spring-born females. Litters produced
by northern populations of tundra voles are more female biased than those of southern
populations. This bias is thought to be influenced by several factors both before
and after birth, but this is not well understood. The gestation period for
M. oeconomus
lasts 20 to 21 days. Neonates weigh about 3 g at birth, have no external hair (except
vibrissae), and are essentially poikilothermic. The newborns are very altricial and
depend heavily on the mother during development. After five days the young are covered
in hair and their eyes open 11 to 13 days after birth. They develop quickly and are
weaned after 18 days, at which point they are fairly independent. Maximum size is
reached as early as two months after weaning. Sexual maturation is reached in three
weeks by females, whereas males do not usually mature until six to eight weeks. This
sex-based delay in maturation serves as a defense against inbreeding in that females
are almost always fertilized before their male siblings are able to mate.
- Key Reproductive Features
- iteroparous
- seasonal breeding
- gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate)
- sexual
- fertilization
- viviparous
Females provide the greater investment in the offspring, including nest construction,
protection, and care of the young. However, increases in paternal investment in southern
populations of tundra voles have been observed. It has been suggested that this is
a result of longer foraging times required by southern females during lactation due
to increased resource limitation at lower latitudes.
- Parental Investment
- altricial
-
pre-fertilization
- provisioning
-
protecting
- female
-
pre-hatching/birth
-
provisioning
- female
-
protecting
- female
-
provisioning
-
pre-weaning/fledging
-
provisioning
- female
-
protecting
- female
-
provisioning
Lifespan/Longevity
There is insufficient research on
Microtus oeconomus
for a definitive lifespan to be established. However, relatively few adults survive
much longer than one year in the wild, and the maximum age for other species of
Microtus
is commonly around two years.
Behavior
Microtus oeconomus
exhibits a polyphasic activity pattern, with an average of seven bouts of activity
per 24 hour time period. Although this type of ultradian rhythm is most prevalent,
secondary crepuscular and circadian patterns have also been observed. In general,
activity is higher during the day than at night and highest during the twilight hours.
Activity levels also increase with decreases in temperature and are relatively unaffected
by humidity and wind due to the protectiveness of preferred habitat types. Tundra
voles are active throughout the year and do not hibernate or engage in bouts of torpor.
Nests are constructed out of coarse vegetation and lined with finer plant materials,
such as sedges. Shallow burrows are dug by
M. oeconomus
in the soil and vegetation layers. These burrows are primarily used as traveling
corridors along with well-developed runways created above ground and in natural features
such as permafrost cracks. Tundra voles generally run in the open and walk under cover,
lacking the bounding progression seen in most mammals.
- Key Behaviors
- terricolous
- diurnal
- nocturnal
- crepuscular
- motile
- sedentary
- solitary
- territorial
- social
Home Range
The home range, territory size, and spacing system of
Microtus oeconomus
vary widely depending on habitat, population density, season, and other factors.
However, several trends have been observed. When food resources are of high quality
and abundant, populations become increasingly clumped around these resources and males
will display mutual territorial behavior. This behavior is also seen in response to
periods of synchronous female breeding, where defense of mates becomes a higher priority.
Males generally occupy and utilize much larger territories than females, and this
territory size is positively correlated with body size. Territories can range up to
3900 m^2 for males, but average 804 m^2 and have little overlap occurring between
them. Females occupy much smaller territories, averaging 377 m^2, but are more philopatric
than males and may share a territory with several other related females. The majority
of male territories contain several female territories, and the resident male will
often defend the breeding rights to all of the females contained within. Males travel
approximately twice as far as females and may utilize an area as large as 12,000 m^2
in a single day.
Communication and Perception
Olfaction is presumably the most important and well-developed sense in
Microtus oeconomus
. Scents are commonly used by the species to identify familiar or unfamiliar individuals
and to determine their age, sex, reproductive condition, diet, or social status. Conspicuous
hip and preputial glands used for scent production are located on both sexes of adult
tundra voles. The glands are largest in males and older individuals, and are only
present in females at higher latitudes. Scent marking behaviors such as scratching
or rubbing are also displayed by
M. oeconomus
. Hearing is well-developed in tundra voles and they may occasionally use vocalizations
for communication, although little is known about this behavior.
- Other Communication Modes
- scent marks
Food Habits
Tundra voles are strictly vegetarian and preferentially feed on sedges (
Carex
sp. and
Eupharium
sp.) that grow in their favored habitat of wet, marshy tundra. Sedges make up around
70 to 80% of their diet, with the remainder comprising herbs, mosses, lichen, and
small woody shrubs. These percentages vary seasonally, and a 30% decrease in sedge
consumption is common in winter, with mosses and lichens becoming a relatively major
component of the diet. Other plant foods that are preferred when available include
Equisetum
sp.,
Dryas integrifolia
,
Salix
sp. and various grasses.
In the fall,
Microtus oeconomus
creates large caches of stored seeds and rhizomes to supplement its winter diet.
Native peoples of North America occasionally sought out these caches in order to obtain
large quantities of desired foods, such as licorice root.
- Plant Foods
- leaves
- roots and tubers
- wood, bark, or stems
- bryophytes
- lichens
- Foraging Behavior
- stores or caches food
Predation
Microtus oeconomus
is an important prey source for many carnivores. During cycles of peak density, they
have been known to comprise the majority of the diet for species such as the arctic
fox (
Vulpes lagopus
) in Alaska. Other known terrestrial predators of
M. oeconomus
include weasels, martens, red foxes, and wolverines. In addition, numerous avian
species prey on tundra voles, including owls, falcons, hawks, jaegers, gulls, and
shrikes.
- Anti-predator Adaptations
- cryptic
Ecosystem Roles
Populations of
Microtus oeconomus
experience cyclical fluctuations, reaching peak densities of 70 to 80 voles per hectare.
As explained above, during these peak density years, tundra voles provide a large
food base for many predator species. When present in such large numbers, they can
also significantly alter the biological production of the tundra ecosystem through
their foraging activities. Tundra voles share their habitat preferences with several
similar species (e.g.,
M. longicaudus
,
M. pennsylvanicus
,
M. agrestis
and
M. xanthognathus
) but generally either avoid competition through niche specialization, or out-compete
the other species, as in the case of
M. agrestis
.
Tundra voles are host to a variety of internal and external parasites. Endoparasites
include cestodes (
Echinococcus
sp.,
Paranoplocephala
sp., and
Taenia
sp.), nematodes (
Heligmosomoides
sp.), and trematodes (
Quinqueserialis nassalli
). Ectoparasites include fleas (
Siphonaptera
sp.), lice (
Polyplax
sp.), and ticks (
Ixodes angustus
).
- cestodes ( Echinococcus , Paranoplocephala , and Taenia )
- nematodes ( Heligmosomoides )
- trematodes ( Quinqueserialis nassalli )
- fleas ( Siphonaptera )
- lice ( Polyplax )
- ticks ( Ixodes angustus )
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
Microtus oeconomus
is commonly considered an ideal species for scientific research due to its adaptability
to laboratory settings, quick development, and rapid population growth. Many important
hypotheses have been tested using tundra voles as model species. As discussed above,
tundra voles also provide an important food base for many carnivores (such as mink
and foxes) that are highly valued for their fur.
- Positive Impacts
- research and education
Economic Importance for Humans: Negative
Tundra voles are known carriers of several diseases. Of most importance to humans
is the role of
Microtus oeconomus
as a carrier of the bacterium (
Francisella tularensis
) that causes tularemia in humans. This disease is transmitted by direct contact and
is fatal in about 7% of untreated human cases. Additionally, at peak densities they
can compete with livestock for forage and cause damage to trees by gnawing on the
roots.
- Negative Impacts
-
injures humans
- carries human disease
Conservation Status
Overall,
Microtus oeconomus
is a relatively stable species and not currently listed as threatened or endangered
on any listing. It is also categorized by the IUCN as a species of “least concern”.
However, insufficient knowledge of several isolated subspecies has resulted in their
categorization of “data deficient” by the IUCN. These subspecies include
M. o. amakensis
,
M. o. elymocetes
,
M. o. innuitus
,
M. o. popofensis
,
M. o. punukensis
, and
M. o. sitkensis
. Furthermore, two subspecies,
M. o. mehelyi
and
M. o. arenicola
, are categorized by the IUCN as “vulnerable” and “critically endangered”, respectively.
Population declines in some subspecies have been attributed to habitat deterioration.
In the case of
M. o. arenicola
, competition with
M. arvalis
has additionally contributed to population declines on some islands.
Other Comments
Microtus oeconomus
is most commonly described as comprising 10 subspecies in the Nearctic and 15 or
more subspecies in the Palearctic. However, these numbers are subject to frequent
debate and revision. New evidence suggests that
Microtus oeconomus
is a relatively recent colonizer of the Nearctic, and most likely crossed the Beringian
land bridge during the Wisconsian (ca. 80,000-100,000 years ago) or Illinoian (ca.
130,000-300,000 years ago) glacial period. Recent research based on molecular evidence
suggests that the species can be divided into four major clades.
Additional Links
Contributors
Tanya Dewey (editor), Animal Diversity Web.
Chad Bieberich (author), University of Alaska Fairbanks, Link E. Olson (editor, instructor), University of Alaska Fairbanks.
- Nearctic
-
living in the Nearctic biogeographic province, the northern part of the New World. This includes Greenland, the Canadian Arctic islands, and all of the North American as far south as the highlands of central Mexico.
- native range
-
the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.
- Palearctic
-
living in the northern part of the Old World. In otherwords, Europe and Asia and northern Africa.
- native range
-
the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.
- holarctic
-
a distribution that more or less circles the Arctic, so occurring in both the Nearctic and Palearctic biogeographic regions.
Found in northern North America and northern Europe or Asia.
- temperate
-
that region of the Earth between 23.5 degrees North and 60 degrees North (between the Tropic of Cancer and the Arctic Circle) and between 23.5 degrees South and 60 degrees South (between the Tropic of Capricorn and the Antarctic Circle).
- polar
-
the regions of the earth that surround the north and south poles, from the north pole to 60 degrees north and from the south pole to 60 degrees south.
- tundra
-
A terrestrial biome with low, shrubby or mat-like vegetation found at extremely high latitudes or elevations, near the limit of plant growth. Soils usually subject to permafrost. Plant diversity is typically low and the growing season is short.
- taiga
-
Coniferous or boreal forest, located in a band across northern North America, Europe, and Asia. This terrestrial biome also occurs at high elevations. Long, cold winters and short, wet summers. Few species of trees are present; these are primarily conifers that grow in dense stands with little undergrowth. Some deciduous trees also may be present.
- forest
-
forest biomes are dominated by trees, otherwise forest biomes can vary widely in amount of precipitation and seasonality.
- mountains
-
This terrestrial biome includes summits of high mountains, either without vegetation or covered by low, tundra-like vegetation.
- bog
-
a wetland area rich in accumulated plant material and with acidic soils surrounding a body of open water. Bogs have a flora dominated by sedges, heaths, and sphagnum.
- endothermic
-
animals that use metabolically generated heat to regulate body temperature independently of ambient temperature. Endothermy is a synapomorphy of the Mammalia, although it may have arisen in a (now extinct) synapsid ancestor; the fossil record does not distinguish these possibilities. Convergent in birds.
- bilateral symmetry
-
having body symmetry such that the animal can be divided in one plane into two mirror-image halves. Animals with bilateral symmetry have dorsal and ventral sides, as well as anterior and posterior ends. Synapomorphy of the Bilateria.
- monogamous
-
Having one mate at a time.
- polygynous
-
having more than one female as a mate at one time
- polygynandrous
-
the kind of polygamy in which a female pairs with several males, each of which also pairs with several different females.
- iteroparous
-
offspring are produced in more than one group (litters, clutches, etc.) and across multiple seasons (or other periods hospitable to reproduction). Iteroparous animals must, by definition, survive over multiple seasons (or periodic condition changes).
- seasonal breeding
-
breeding is confined to a particular season
- sexual
-
reproduction that includes combining the genetic contribution of two individuals, a male and a female
- fertilization
-
union of egg and spermatozoan
- viviparous
-
reproduction in which fertilization and development take place within the female body and the developing embryo derives nourishment from the female.
- altricial
-
young are born in a relatively underdeveloped state; they are unable to feed or care for themselves or locomote independently for a period of time after birth/hatching. In birds, naked and helpless after hatching.
- diurnal
-
- active during the day, 2. lasting for one day.
- nocturnal
-
active during the night
- crepuscular
-
active at dawn and dusk
- motile
-
having the capacity to move from one place to another.
- sedentary
-
remains in the same area
- solitary
-
lives alone
- territorial
-
defends an area within the home range, occupied by a single animals or group of animals of the same species and held through overt defense, display, or advertisement
- social
-
associates with others of its species; forms social groups.
- acoustic
-
uses sound to communicate
- chemical
-
uses smells or other chemicals to communicate
- scent marks
-
communicates by producing scents from special gland(s) and placing them on a surface whether others can smell or taste them
- visual
-
uses sight to communicate
- tactile
-
uses touch to communicate
- acoustic
-
uses sound to communicate
- chemical
-
uses smells or other chemicals to communicate
- stores or caches food
-
places a food item in a special place to be eaten later. Also called "hoarding"
- cryptic
-
having markings, coloration, shapes, or other features that cause an animal to be camouflaged in its natural environment; being difficult to see or otherwise detect.
- herbivore
-
An animal that eats mainly plants or parts of plants.
- folivore
-
an animal that mainly eats leaves.
References
Aars, J., H. Andreassen, R. Ims. 1995. Root voles: litter sex ratio variation in fragmented habitat. Journal of Animal Ecology , 64(4): 459-472.
Aars, J., R. Ims. 2002. Intrinsic and climatic determinants of population demography: the winter dynamics of tundra voles. Ecology , 83(12): 3449–3456.
Anthony, R., N. Barten, P. Seiser. 2000. Foods of arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus ) during winter and spring in western Alaska. Journal of Mammalogy , 81(3): 820-828.
Batzli, G., C. Lesieutre. 1991. The influence of high quality food on habitat use by arctic microtine rodents. Oikos , 60(3): 299-306.
Bergman, C., C. Krebs. 1993. Diet overlap of collared lemmings and tundra voles at Pearce-Point, Northwest-Territories. Canadian Journal of Zoology , 71(9): 1703-1709.
Bondrup-Nielsen, S., R. Ims. 1990. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in microtines: are females larger than males or are males smaller than females?. Evolutionary Ecology , 4: 261-272.
Bozinovic, F., M. Rosenmann. 1989. Maximum metabolic rate of rodents: physiological and ecological consequences on distributional limits. Functional Ecology , 3(2): 173-181.
Brunhoff, C., K. Galbreath, V. Fedorov, J. Cook, M. Jaarola. 2003. Holarctic phylogeography of the root vole ( Microtus oeconomus ): implications for late Quaternary biogeography of high latitudes. Molecular Ecology , 12: 957-968.
Feldhamer, G., B. Thompson, J. Chapman. 2003. Wild mammals of North America : biology, management, and conservation. 2nd ed . Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Galbreath, K., J. Cook. 2004. Genetic consequences of Pleistocene glaciations for the tundra vole ( Microtus oeconomus ) in Beringia. Molecular Ecology , 13: 135-148.
Gippoliti, S. 2006. "2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species" (On-line). Microtus oeconomus ssp. arenicola . Accessed December 04, 2006 at http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/40769/summ .
Gliwicz, J. 1997. Space use in the root vole: basic patterns and variability. Ecography , 20(4): 383-389.
Gromov, I., I. Polyakov. 1992. Voles (Microtinae) . Washington D.C: Smithsonian Institution Libraries and the National Science Foundation.
Hall, R. 1981. The mammals of North America. 2nd ed . New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
Halle, S. 1995. Diel pattern of locomotor activity in populations of root voles Microtus oeconomus . Journal of Biological Rhythms , 10(3): 211-224.
Hoffmann, R., J. Koeppl. 1985. Zoogeography. Pp. 84–115 in Biology of New World Microtus . Boston, MA: The American Society of Mammalogists.
Ims, R. 1997. Determinants of geographic variation in growth and reproductive traits in the root vole. Ecology , 78(2): 461-470.
Ims, R. 1994. Litter sex ratio variation in laboratory colonies of two geographically distinct strains of the root vole Microtus oeconomus . Ecography , 17(2): 141-146.
Ims, R. 1987. Male spacing systems in microtine rodents. The American Naturalist , 130(4): 475-484.
Innes, D. 1978. A reexamination of litter sizes in some North American microtines.. Canadian Journal of Zoology , 56(7): 1488-1496.
Kaikusalo, A., J. Tast. 1984. Winter breeding of microtine rodents at Kilpisjaervi, Finnish Lapland. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ. , 10: 243-252.
Lambin, X., C. Krebs, B. Scott. 1992. Spacing system of the tundra vole ( Microtus oeconomus ) during the breeding season in Canada’s western arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology , 70(10): 2068-2072.
Lance, E., J. Cook. 1998. Biogeography of tundra voles ( Microtus oeconomus ) of Beringia and the southern coast of Alaska. Journal of Mammalogy , 79(1): 53-65.
Litvin, V., E. Karaseva. 1968. A study of the daily migrations of Microtus oeconomus Pall. Voles by radioactive tagging. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal , 47(11): 1701-1706.
MacDonald, S. 2003. The small mammals of Alaska: A field handbook of the shrews and small rodents . Unpublished Draft.
Musser, G., M. Carleton. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea. Pp. 894-1522 in Mammal Species of the World . Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nagorsen, D. 2002. An identification manual to the small mammals of British Columbia . British Columbia, Canada: Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management.
Nowak, R. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World . Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ostfeld, R. 1985. Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents. The American Naturalist , 126(1): 1-15.
Ringens, P., G. Folk, J. Berberich. 1977. Cold acclimation in the tundra vole. Acta Theriologica , 22(3): 67-74.
Ru-Yung, S., Z. Jing-Xiang. 1987. Postnatal development of thermoregulation in root vole and some comments on the index of homeothermy ability. Journal of Thermal Biology , 12(4): 267-272.
Sundell, J., O. Huitu, H. Henttonen, A. Kaikusalo, E. Korpimäki, H. Pietiäinen, P. Saurola, I. Hanski, E. Korpimaeki, H. Pietiaeinen. 2004. Large-scale spatial dynamics of vole populations in Finland revealed by the breeding success of vole-eating avian predators. Journal of Animal Ecology , 73(1): 167-178.
Tast, J. 1968. Influence of the root vole, Microtus oeconomus (Pallas), upon the habitat selection of the field vole, Microtus agrestis (L.), in northern Finland . Helsinki, Finland: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Tast, J. 1966. The root vole, Microtus oeconomus (Pallas), as an inhabitant of seasonally flooded land. Annales Zoologici Fennici , 3: 127-171.
Timm, R. 1985. Parasites. Pp. 455-528 in Biology of New World Microtus . Boston, MA: American Society of Mammalogists.
Viitala, J. 1994. Monogamy in free-living Microtus oeconomus . Annales Zoologici Fennici , 31(3): 343-345.
Whitney, P. 1976. Population ecology of two sympatric species of subarctic microtine rodents. Ecological Monographs , 46(1): 85-104.
Wilson, D., S. Ruff. 1999. The Smithsonian book of North American mammals . Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.