Pithecia pitheciaGuianan saki

Ge­o­graphic Range

White-faced sakis (Pithe­cia pithe­cia) are lo­cated in Brazil, and re­mote parts of Venezuela. Their range also en­com­passes most of French Guiana, Guyana and Suri­name. They live along the Cuyuni river basin, east of the Ca­roni River, and south of the Orinoco River. (Veiga and Marsh, 2008)

Habi­tat

White-faced sakis are ar­bo­real and live in both up­land and low­land rain­forests. Al­though they can in­habit very wet and very dry forests, they pre­fer areas with an abun­dance of fruit trees and wa­ter­ing holes. This species is most com­mon at canopy heights of 15 to 25 m. They will also spend time for­ag­ing on the ground and at low lev­els in the un­der­story fo­liage (3 to 15 m). Overnight sleep­ing areas typ­i­cally are larger trees in the canopy with a wealth of fo­liage for cover. (Anzelc, 2009; Cun­ning­ham and Jan­son, 2007)

Phys­i­cal De­scrip­tion

White-faced sakis ex­hibit sex­ual di­mor­phism, with larger males, and sex­ual dichro­ma­tism. Males have a black coat with white fur that sur­rounds their face. Fe­male sakis have a shorter, brown­ish grey coat with two ver­ti­cal lines from their eyes to their nose. Fe­males may also have or­ange brown col­ored fur that emerges around the chest area and con­tin­ues down to their ab­domen. At birth males and adult fe­males are very sim­i­lar in ap­pear­ance. A grad­ual color change over 3.5 to 4 years oc­curs, in which male sakis be­come all black with bright white faces. Sakis have long bushy tails, which are used for bal­ance while jump­ing from tree to tree. The tails are not used for grasp­ing ob­jects or branches. Av­er­age adult mass is 1.8 kg; how­ever, a slight sex­ual di­mor­phism sep­a­rates males (2.38 kg) from fe­males (1.76 kg). (Anzelc, 2009; Flea­gle and Mel­drum, 1988; Nor­conk, 2006)

  • Sexual Dimorphism
  • male larger
  • sexes colored or patterned differently
  • male more colorful
  • Average mass
    1.871 kg
    4.12 lb

Re­pro­duc­tion

Sakis are known to be monog­a­mous in cap­tiv­ity (zoo en­vi­ron­ments) al­though Wa­ters (1995) in­di­cates there have been ex­cep­tions in the wild. Anzelc (2009) sug­gests that monogamy in the wild is less com­mon than ex­pected, and is less com­mon when groups are larger than 2 to 3 in­di­vid­u­als. Groups of 4 to 6 are not un­com­mon, and can in­clude more than one adult breed­ing male or fe­male. This sug­gests polyg­a­mous or polyan­drous mat­ing sys­tem, de­pend­ing on the break­down of adults in the group. (Anzelc, 2009; Wa­ters, 1995)

Males and fe­males live in small groups. De­spite prac­tic­ing monogamy in zoos, a study of wild sakis in Venezuela found that some sakis were not monog­a­mous. In wild groups, males will make calls to the fe­males dur­ing mat­ing sea­son in­stead of as an alarm call. Males reach sex­ual ma­tu­rity in ap­prox­i­mately 32 months. Fe­males are about the same age, but can take sev­eral months more. It isn't until the fe­males' ovar­ian cycle is reg­u­lar that they are de­ter­mined sex­u­ally ma­ture. Ges­ta­tion pe­ri­ods for sakis av­er­age 146 days, and fe­males bear 1 off­spring at a time. Saki sib­lings from the pre­vi­ous year or 2 may help care for a new­born saki. (Nor­conk, 2006)

  • Breeding interval
    Sakis breed once per year.
  • Breeding season
    Sakis breed in the spring.
  • Average number of offspring
    1
  • Average gestation period
    146 days
  • Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
    32 months

Fe­males sakis are the pre­dom­i­nant care­tak­ers. In­fants stay at­tached to their mother's thigh from birth to 1 month. From age one to four months, the young shift to a dor­sal po­si­tion where they can achieve greater mo­bil­ity. The moth­ers carry their in­fants for the first 3 months. After the in­fant is around the age of 5 months, the mother will stop car­ry­ing it. They feed, pro­tect, and nur­ture young until they are ready to be on their own. How­ever, in­fants ob­serve one birthing event prior to leav­ing their fam­ily group. (Nor­conk, 2006; Wa­ters, 1995)

  • Parental Investment
  • female parental care
  • pre-hatching/birth
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • female
  • pre-weaning/fledging
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • female
  • pre-independence
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • female
  • extended period of juvenile learning

Lifes­pan/Longevity

In the wild, white-faced sakis have been known to live about 15 years. One wild-caught saki in cap­tiv­ity lived to the age of 36, spend­ing over 28 of those years in cap­tiv­ity. (de Ma­g­a­l­haes and Costa, 2009)

  • Range lifespan
    Status: captivity
    36 (high) years
  • Average lifespan
    Status: wild
    15 years

Be­hav­ior

Sakis are so­cial but live in small groups of just 2 to 4 in­di­vid­u­als. The groups travel to­gether daily, and can eas­ily move 1 to 2 km per day. Most move­ment oc­curs in the early morn­ing and early hours of the af­ter­noon. They spend about 9 hours on the move. These ac­tiv­ity bouts are rel­a­tively shorter than re­lated mon­keys, who may be ac­tive 10 to 12 hours per day. Sakis are adept leapers aid­ing in preda­tor avoid­ance. Male and fe­male sakis ex­hibit groom­ing and mat­ing be­hav­iors, most com­mon be­tween moth­ers and in­fants. Male and fe­male sakis teach each other how to raise the young. In cap­tiv­ity sakis have been known to carry group mem­ber's in­fant. (Anzelc, 2009; Walker, 2005; Wa­ters, 1995)

Fe­males in cap­tiv­ity start to re­pro­duce much ear­lier in age than they would in the wild, which leads to ear­lier mor­tal­ity. After reach­ing at least 37 months, the sur­vival rate of the in­di­vid­ual greatly in­creases. The longer the fe­male waits to re­pro­duce, the longer she will live. One ex­am­ple of late birthing was ob­served in an 18-year-old saki who gave birth in a zoo. This saki lived in the wild in its na­tive habi­tat until she was cap­tured late in life al­ter­ing her be­hav­ior from those reared in cap­tiv­ity. (Wa­ters, 1995)

  • Range territory size
    1 to 15.2 km^2

Home Range

Groups of sakis in Suri­name have been known to use a rel­a­tively small home range of 10 hectares. Re­lo­cated groups uti­lize much larger home ranges, and re­ports of 68 to 152 ha were typ­i­cal. These sakis will mark and de­fend their ter­ri­tory by a se­ries of ac­tiv­i­ties. Anzelc (2009) sum­ma­rizes them as "scent gland (ster­nal/gular/anogen­i­tal) rub­bing, urine-wash­ing, and ter­ri­to­r­ial calls ....​and ag­o­nis­tic in­ter­ac­tions, using grunts, trills, branch and body shakes, pi­lo­erec­tion, and fast pur­suits to threaten and dis­place ex­tra-group mem­bers." (Anzelc, 2009)

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion and Per­cep­tion

Sakis live in small groups rang­ing from 2 to 4 in­di­vid­u­als; how­ever larger groups of 6 or more have been re­ported and may in­clude more than one adult breed­ing male or fe­male. To es­tab­lish ter­ri­tory they have loud vocal calls usu­ally per­formed in duets of monog­a­mous males and fe­males. These duets strength­ens their courtship bond. They also so­cial­ize by groom­ing on one an­other. White-faced sakis will scent-mark an area. Males rub their chests on trees. They usu­ally choose trees with ed­i­ble fruit to ex­cite fe­males and to try to stim­u­late courtship be­hav­ior dur­ing breed­ing sea­son. (Anzelc, 2009; Lehman, et al., 2001; Setz and Gas­par, 1997)

Food Habits

Sakis eat the seeds of fruit­ing bod­ies. They spend 95 to 99% of total con­sump­tion time eat­ing and break­ing open the seeds. Year-round, they pre­fer to eat seeds 38 to 88% of the time. Leaves are also an im­por­tant source of food. They eat the young leaves of plants dur­ing the dry sea­son when fruits are not plen­ti­ful. Given this diet, their in­take of fats are ex­tremely high, but their in­take of pro­teins are low. On oc­ca­sion, they have been known to con­sume in­sects and flow­ers when fruit is scarce. (Anzelc, 2009; Nor­conk and Con­klin-Brit­tain, 2004)

  • Animal Foods
  • insects
  • Plant Foods
  • leaves
  • seeds, grains, and nuts
  • fruit
  • flowers

Pre­da­tion

When a ter­res­trial preda­tor, such as red-tailed boas, are near sakis will first make an alarm call. Then they will group to­gether and mob the preda­tor in hopes of dri­ving it away. Other ter­res­trial preda­tors in­clude a weasel called tayras, jaguars, green ana­con­das, and ocelots. Their biggest threats are avian preda­tors. Be­cause of their size, sakis are easy prey to the harpy eagle, which are known to at­tack large pri­mates. A study re­ported more alarm calls when there is an avian threat, such as an eagle or vul­ture. When a bird of prey is spot­ted sakis make the alarm call, which is echoed by group mem­ber, and then they stay com­pletely mo­tion­less. After time has elapsed, sakis might slip out un­de­tected, head­ing for low­est parts of the canopy. They try to re­main as con­cealed as pos­si­ble in the canopy. (Nor­conk and Glea­son, 2002)

Ecosys­tem Roles

Saki have par­a­sites typ­i­cal to that of new world mon­keys and non-hu­man pri­mates. For ex­am­ple a com­mon par­a­sites are round­worms (Ptery­go­der­matites nyc­ticebi). Heart­worms (Diro­fi­laria im­mi­tis) are pre­sent in this species, too. They can also get dis­eases such as di­a­betes and the Ma­yaro virus (which is found in mam­mals that live in trees). (Gam­ble, et al., 1998; Thoisy, et al., 2003)

  • Ecosystem Impact
  • disperses seeds
Com­men­sal/Par­a­sitic Species

Eco­nomic Im­por­tance for Hu­mans: Pos­i­tive

White-faced sakis are charais­matic or­gan­isms that at­tract high in­ter­est in zoos, how­ever they are re­cently being ex­ploited for their charisma. There is a mar­ket for these mon­keys as pets, which is detri­men­tal to the sakis. They are hunted as a source of food by lo­cals. This hurts the pop­u­la­tion of sakis, be­cause they don't re­pro­duce quickly enough to re­place the in­di­vid­u­als killed and cap­tured. ("White-Faced Saki Mon­key", 2012)

  • Positive Impacts
  • pet trade
  • food
  • body parts are source of valuable material

Eco­nomic Im­por­tance for Hu­mans: Neg­a­tive

Sakis may carry dis­eases which can be trans­ferred to hu­mans in­clud­ing the he­pati­tis virus and the nat­u­rally oc­cur­ring her­pes vir­sus (HSV-1). How­ever, they are not a major dis­ease trans­mit­ter. (Schren­zel, et al., 2003)

Con­ser­va­tion Sta­tus

This species is not cur­rently listed by IUCN and is of lit­tle con­cern for con­ser­va­tion man­agers. How­ever, due to habi­tat de­struc­tion and the pet trade, this sta­tus could change. It is listed in Ap­pen­dix II of CITES, in­di­cat­ing that the species could be­come threat­ened if trade or im­port and/or ex­port is not reg­u­lated. (Veiga and Marsh, 2008)

Con­trib­u­tors

Nicole Gru­bich (au­thor), Rad­ford Uni­ver­sity, Karen Pow­ers (ed­i­tor), Rad­ford Uni­ver­sity, Kier­sten Newtoff (ed­i­tor), Rad­ford Uni­ver­sity, Melissa Whistle­man (ed­i­tor), Rad­ford Uni­ver­sity.

Glossary

Neotropical

living in the southern part of the New World. In other words, Central and South America.

World Map

acoustic

uses sound to communicate

aposematic

having coloration that serves a protective function for the animal, usually used to refer to animals with colors that warn predators of their toxicity. For example: animals with bright red or yellow coloration are often toxic or distasteful.

arboreal

Referring to an animal that lives in trees; tree-climbing.

bilateral symmetry

having body symmetry such that the animal can be divided in one plane into two mirror-image halves. Animals with bilateral symmetry have dorsal and ventral sides, as well as anterior and posterior ends. Synapomorphy of the Bilateria.

causes or carries domestic animal disease

either directly causes, or indirectly transmits, a disease to a domestic animal

chemical

uses smells or other chemicals to communicate

duets

to jointly display, usually with sounds in a highly coordinated fashion, at the same time as one other individual of the same species, often a mate

endothermic

animals that use metabolically generated heat to regulate body temperature independently of ambient temperature. Endothermy is a synapomorphy of the Mammalia, although it may have arisen in a (now extinct) synapsid ancestor; the fossil record does not distinguish these possibilities. Convergent in birds.

female parental care

parental care is carried out by females

folivore

an animal that mainly eats leaves.

food

A substance that provides both nutrients and energy to a living thing.

frugivore

an animal that mainly eats fruit

granivore

an animal that mainly eats seeds

herbivore

An animal that eats mainly plants or parts of plants.

iteroparous

offspring are produced in more than one group (litters, clutches, etc.) and across multiple seasons (or other periods hospitable to reproduction). Iteroparous animals must, by definition, survive over multiple seasons (or periodic condition changes).

monogamous

Having one mate at a time.

motile

having the capacity to move from one place to another.

native range

the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.

pet trade

the business of buying and selling animals for people to keep in their homes as pets.

pheromones

chemicals released into air or water that are detected by and responded to by other animals of the same species

polyandrous

Referring to a mating system in which a female mates with several males during one breeding season (compare polygynous).

polygynous

having more than one female as a mate at one time

rainforest

rainforests, both temperate and tropical, are dominated by trees often forming a closed canopy with little light reaching the ground. Epiphytes and climbing plants are also abundant. Precipitation is typically not limiting, but may be somewhat seasonal.

scent marks

communicates by producing scents from special gland(s) and placing them on a surface whether others can smell or taste them

seasonal breeding

breeding is confined to a particular season

sedentary

remains in the same area

sexual

reproduction that includes combining the genetic contribution of two individuals, a male and a female

social

associates with others of its species; forms social groups.

tactile

uses touch to communicate

terrestrial

Living on the ground.

territorial

defends an area within the home range, occupied by a single animals or group of animals of the same species and held through overt defense, display, or advertisement

tropical

the region of the earth that surrounds the equator, from 23.5 degrees north to 23.5 degrees south.

vibrations

movements of a hard surface that are produced by animals as signals to others

visual

uses sight to communicate

viviparous

reproduction in which fertilization and development take place within the female body and the developing embryo derives nourishment from the female.

Ref­er­ences

2012. "White-Faced Saki Mon­key" (On-line). Ore­gon Zoo. Ac­cessed April 09, 2012 at http://​www.​oregonzoo.​org/​discover/​animals/​white-faced-saki-monkey.

Anzelc, A. 2009. The For­ag­ing and Travel Pat­terns of White-Faced Sakis in Browns­berg Na­ture Park, Suri­name: Pre­lim­i­nary Ev­i­dence for Goal-Di­rected For­ag­ing Be­hav­ior. Kent, Ohio: Kent State Uni­ver­sity, Mas­ter's the­sis, 194 oo.. Ac­cessed April 24, 2012 at http://​www.​personal.​kent.​edu/​~mnor­conk/pdfs/Anzelc-thesis-7-20-09b.​pdf.

Cun­ning­ham, E., C. Jan­son. 2007. In­te­grat­ing in­for­ma­tion about lo­ca­tion and value of re­sources by white-faced saki mon­keys (Pithe­cia pithe­cia). An­i­mal Cog­ni­tion, 10/3: 293-304.

Flea­gle, J., D. Mel­drum. 1988. Lo­co­mo­tor be­hav­ior and skele­tal mor­phol­ogy of two sym­patric Pitheci­ine mon­keys, Pithe­cia pithe­cia and Chi­ropotes sa­tanas. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 16/3: 227-249.

Gam­ble, K., J. Fried, G. Rubin. 1998. Pre­sump­tive diro­fi­lar­i­a­sis in a pale-headed saki mon­key (Pithe­cia pithe­cia). Jour­nal of Zoo and Wildlife Med­i­cine, 29/1: 50-54.

Lehman, S., W. Prince, M. Mayor. 2001. Vari­a­tions in group size in white-faced sakis (Pithe­cia pithe­cia): Ev­i­dence for monogamy or sea­sonal con­gre­ga­tions. Neotrop­i­cal Pri­mates, 9/3: 96-100.

Lloyd, M., J. Susa, J. Pelto, A. Sav­age. 1995. Ges­ta­tional di­a­betes mel­li­tus in a white-faced saki (Pithe­cia pithe­cia). Jour­nal of Zoo and Wildlife Med­i­cine, 26/1: 76-81.

Nor­conk, M. 2006. Long-term study of group dy­nam­ics and fe­male re­pro­duc­tion in Venezue­lan Pithe­cia pithe­cia. In­ter­na­tional Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 27/3: 653-674.

Nor­conk, M., A. Rosen­berger, P. Gar­ber. 1996. Adap­tive Ra­di­a­tions of Neotrop­i­cal Pri­mates. New York: Plenum Press.

Nor­conk, M., N. Con­klin-Brit­tain. 2004. Vari­a­tion on fru­givory: The diet of Venezue­lan white-faced Sakis. In­ter­na­tion Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 25/1: 1-26.

Nor­conk, M., T. Glea­son. 2002. Pre­da­tion risk and an­tipreda­tor adap­ta­tions in white-faced sakis, Pithe­cia pithe­cia. Pp. 169-183 in L Miller, ed. Eat or be eaten: preda­tor sen­si­tive for­ag­ing among pri­mates. Cam­bridge, United King­dom: Press Syn­di­cate of the Uni­ver­sity of Cam­bridge.

Richard-Hansen, C., C. Fournier-Cham­bril­lon. 2001. Abun­dance, use of space, and ac­tiv­ity pat­terns of white-faced sakis (Pithe­cia pithe­cia) in French Guiana. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 55/4: 203-221.

Schren­zel, M., K. Os­born, A. Shima, R. Klieforth, G. Maalouf. 2003. Nat­u­rally oc­cur­ing fatal her­pes sim­plex virus 1 in­fec­tion in a fam­ily of white-faced saki mon­keys (Pithe­cia pithe­cia pithe­cia). Jour­nal of Med­ical Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 32/1: 7-14.

Setz, E., J. En­zweiler, V. Solferini, M. Amen­dola, R. Berton. 1999. Geophagy in the golden-faced saki mon­key (Pithe­cia pithe­cia chrysocephala) in the Cen­tral Ama­zon. Jour­nal of Zo­ol­ogy, 247/1: 91-103.

Setz, E., D. Gas­par. 1997. Scent-mark­ing be­hav­iour in free-rang­ing golden-faced saki mon­keys, Pithe­cia pithe­cia chrysocephala: Sex dif­fer­ences and con­text. Jour­nal of Zo­ol­ogy, 241/3: 603-611.

Suss­man, R., J. Phillips-Con­roy. 1995. A sur­vey of the dis­tri­b­u­tion and den­sity of the pri­mates of Guyana. In­ter­na­tional Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 16/5: 761-791.

Thoisy, B., J. Gar­don, R. Salas, J. Mor­van, M. Kazanji. 2003. Ma­yaro virus in wild mam­mals, French Guiana. Emerg­ing In­fec­tious Dis­eases, 9/10: 1326-1329.

Thoisy, B., I. Vogel, J. Reynes, J. Pouliquen, B. Carme, M. Kazanji, J. Vie. 2001. Health eval­u­a­tion of translo­cated free-rang­ing pri­mates in French Guiana. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 54/1: 1-16.

Veiga, L., L. Marsh. 2008. "IUCN Red List of Threat­ened Species" (On-line). Pithe­cia pithe­cia. Ac­cessed Feb­ru­ary 23, 2012 at www.​iucnredlist.​org.

Walker, S. 2005. Leap­ing be­hav­ior of Pithe­cia pithe­cia and Chi­ropotes sa­tanas in east­ern Venezuela. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 66/4: 369-387.

War­ren, K., M. Nor­conk. 1993. : Phys­i­cal and chem­i­cal prop­er­ties of fruit and seeds eaten by Pithe­cia and Chi­ropotes; in Suri­nam and Venezuela. In­ter­na­tional Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 14/2: 207-227.

Wa­ters, S. 1995. A re­view of so­cial pa­ra­me­ters which in­flu­ence breed­ing Pithe­cia pithe­cia in white-faced saki in cap­tiv­ity. In­ter­na­tional Zoo Year­book, 34/1: 147-153.

de Ma­g­a­l­haes, J., J. Costa. 2009. A data­base of ver­te­brate longevity records and their re­la­tion to other life-his­tory traits. Jour­nal of Evo­lu­tion­ary Bi­ol­ogy, 22/8: 1770-1774.