Microtus pennsylvanicusmeadow vole

Geographic Range

Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) have a wide range that includes most of North America. These rodents are found in Canada, throughout most of Alaska, and across approximately half of the United States. They inhabit areas as far north as the Northwest Territories of Canada, and as far south as Folly Beach, South Carolina. These mammals are also found as far east as St. John, Canada and as far west as Unalakleet, Alaska, in the Norton Sound. They are found throughout the northeast and the east coast states of the United States, southward to South Carolina and Georgia. They inhabit western states that include parts of Washington, Idaho and Colorado. These voles are also found as far southwest as northern New Mexico. Although they are found across the Midwest to the East Coast, they are absent in Oklahoma, Kansas and most of Missouri. Disjunct populations of this species are found west of Gainesville, Florida as well as in Chihuahua, Mexico, and sparsely across sections of New Mexico. (Linzey and Hammerson, 2008)

Habitat

Meadow voles are found in grassy areas across their geographic range. They are known to inhabit areas close to roadways, as long as there is grass coverage for tunneling and nesting. These voles almost exclusively use early successional habitats, which also include agricultural fields, sedge marshes, and open-canopied bogs. They are occasionally found in more densely wooded areas. Studies have shown that meadow voles have a denser distribution in uncut grass, which is likely due to their nesting habits above ground. (Francl, et al., 2008; Grant, 1971; Klatt, et al., 2015)

Physical Description

The average length of adult meadow voles is 167.5 mm (range 140-195). The length of the voles’ tails is between 33 mm and 64 mm, which is one-third to one-half the length of their body length. The length of the hind feet of these voles ranges from 18 to 24 mm, and their ear length ranges from 12 to 16 mm. The average mass of an adult male is 44.2 g (range 37.91-50.49), and the average mass of an adult female is 44.0 g (range 33.75-54.25). The average cranial length of an adult male is 27.4 mm. The average cranial breadth of an adult male is 11.0 mm. The cephalic index, the ratio of the maximum breadth of a skull to its length, of adult male meadow voles is only marginally larger than that of adult females. The dental formula for these voles is I 1/1, C 0/0, P 0/0, M 3/3 = 16. (Ford, et al., 2007; Reich, 1981; Unangst and Wunder, 2004)

With sexes alike in coloration, meadow voles’ coats are made up of two types of hair with color variation throughout each individual. The soft tricolored hair on their posterior end is colored with dark gray at the roots, orange and yellow sections in the middle, and darker tips. The soft hair on the anterior portion of the voles is bicolored with gray at the root, and fading to white at the tip. The softer hair is found underneath the longer, firmer, hair. The firmer hair is bicolored with a gray color near the roots and dark brown ends, mostly located on the posterior side. During molting it is noted that the softer hair found under the firmer hair is thinner during the summer months. The variance in color is dependent upon maturity in these mammals. Newborn meadow voles are born hairless, and weigh between 1.6 g and 3.0 g. Between 4 and 7 days after birth, the offspring develop hair that is slightly darker than hair of the adult voles. As they mature into adults, the voles’ hair color begins to vary. (Reich, 1981; Unangst and Wunder, 2004)

  • Sexual Dimorphism
  • sexes alike
  • Range mass
    33.75 to 50.49 g
    1.19 to 1.78 oz
  • Average mass
    44.0-44.2 g
    oz
  • Range length
    140 to 195 mm
    5.51 to 7.68 in
  • Average basal metabolic rate
    0.428 W
    AnAge

Reproduction

Meadow voles demonstrate a polygynandrous mating system. Boonstra et al. (1983) found that 33.1% of the tested female meadow voles had single litters consisting of offspring with multiple fathers. Female meadow voles are territorial during their mating season, and nest alone. They are aggressive towards other females as well as some males throughout the mating season. Male meadow voles are not territorial and share domains with multiple females at once. Pheromones are used amongst these voles to initiate mating. After mating has taken place, male meadow voles depart from the females, and female meadow voles strictly defend their territory. (Boonstra, et al., 1993; Elbroch and Rinehart, 2011; Ferkin and Johnston, 1995; Naughton, 2012; Reich, 1981)

Meadow voles can mate year-round, although mating is most common from March to November. The average age of sexual maturity occurs in females at around 25 days (range 20-30), and around 40 days in males (range 35-45). The average gestation period for these voles is 21 days (range 20-23), and they are able to reproduce approximately every three weeks. Post-partum estrous takes place after the birth of a litter more than 50% of the time. This means that female meadow voles can produce multiple litters per breeding season, and can mate immediately after giving birth. Litters consist of 1 to 11 pups, with the average being 4-6. Meadow voles are born altricial, without hair, and with their eyes and ears closed. They weigh between 1.6 and 3.0 g at birth, averaging at around 2.3 g. Pups grow fur between 4 and 7 days, and their eyes and ears open around day 8. They are weaned, at 12-14 days, and once weaned they become independent. (Boonstra, et al., 1993; Dietloff, et al., 2010; Elbroch and Rinehart, 2011; Naughton, 2012; Reich, 1981)

  • Breeding interval
    Meadow voles breed as frequently as every 3 weeks from spring to fall and less frequently during the winter.
  • Breeding season
    Mating occurs most commonly from March to November.
  • Range number of offspring
    1 to 11
  • Average number of offspring
    4-6
  • Average number of offspring
    5.5
    AnAge
  • Range gestation period
    20 to 23 days
  • Average gestation period
    21 days
  • Average weaning age
    12-14 days
  • Average time to independence
    12-14 days
  • Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
    20 to 30 days
  • Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
    35 to 45 days

Female meadow voles solely take care of their pups. Males are not involved in any caring for the offspring. Litters of pups are born within the females’ home range. Shortly after giving birth, females place pups into a nest they have built out of various plant stems, grasses, and leaves. Pups are born altricial, and must be nursed and protected by their mothers. Using ultrasonic calling, pups are able to communicate their temperature to their mother. Often this is an indication that a pup has wandered out of the nest. Maternal care is shown until the pups are weaned at 12-14 days. McGuire and Novak (1984) found that meadow voles show notably less parental investment toward pups than pine voles Mictrotus pinetorum and prairie voles Microtus ochrogaster. (Boonstra, et al., 1993; Elbroch and Rinehart, 2011; Gruder-Adams and Getz, 1985; Klatt, et al., 2015; McGuire and Novak, 1984; Naughton, 2012; Reich, 1981; Sabau and Ferkin, 2013)

Lifespan/Longevity

On average, in the wild, these voles have a life span of 2-3 months, though some can live up to 16 months. Meadow voles in captivity can live longer than 2.5 years. (Naughton, 2012)

  • Range lifespan
    Status: wild
    16 (high) months
  • Range lifespan
    Status: captivity
    greater than 2.5 (high) years
  • Typical lifespan
    Status: wild
    2 to 3 months

Behavior

The behavior of meadow voles is dependent upon the season. Throughout the more active breeding season (March-November) females are highly aggressive and territorial. Females are aggressive towards both other females and males, when mating and caring for their pups. Aggressiveness is often characterized by the bearing or chattering of teeth, as well as vocalizations like squeaking or screeching. Females are solitary and defend a small portion, approximately 38 m^2, of their home ranges during this time. Males are not generally territorial towards other meadow voles. They have larger home ranges that can overlap with several females’ at once. An occasional male- to-male confrontation occurs when multiple males are attracted to the same female. This can lead to a short show of dominance between males and only lasts until mating is complete. Meadow voles may nest together during the colder months when mating is less common. These voles are active during the day and night. Although variable, they usually are diurnal during the cooler months and nocturnal during the warmer months. (Elbroch and Rinehart, 2011; Klatt, et al., 2015; Naughton, 2012; Reich, 1981)

  • Average territory size
    38 m^2

Home Range

Meadow voles have a home range size relative to their sex. Males have a much larger home range than females. The home ranges of males are 405-3480 m^2 while the home ranges of females are 160-3115 m^2. Female meadow voles are territorial of only about 38 m^2 of their home ranges. (Elbroch and Rinehart, 2011; Naughton, 2012)

Communication and Perception

Males and females interact more frequently during their breeding season (March-November), using sex hormones to communicate. Scents from urine and feces are used as communication tools when establishing territories. Although most communication occurs through chemical signaling and scent, when male or female voles are acting with aggressive tendencies, vocalizations may occur. As newborns, these rodents are able to communicate using ultrasonic calling. Blake (2012) found that ultrasonic calling peaked at 5-9 days, with the rate of 9 calls per minute in Greensboro, North Carolina. This is used when the pups are left alone and their body temperatures drop. Generally, the ultrasonic calling subsides within three weeks of birth. (Blake, 2012; Ferkin and Johnston, 1995; Reich, 1981; Vlautin and Ferkin, 2013)

Food Habits

The diet of meadow voles consists mostly of different types of grasses, and other plants. Barry (1976) showed that more than 90% of these voles’ diets consist of greenery. Zimmerman (1965) reported that Canada bluegrass Poa compressa, rock muhly Muhlenbergia sobolifera, witchgrass Panicum capillare, and narrowleaf plantain Plantago lanceolate make up more than eighty percent of their regular diet in a study conducted near Terre Haute, Illinois. Although these voles are considered herbivores, when greenery is scarce in the winter months they may turn to insects, larvae, dead and decaying animals, as well as occasionally their own offspring for survival. A negligible amount of fungi has been recorded in the diet of these rodents. Meadow voles may consume grains, fruits and vegetables, and even woody material, including trees and roots. (Barry, 1976; Dietloff, et al., 2010; Reich, 1981; Thompson, 1965; Zimmerman, 1965)

  • Animal Foods
  • mammals
  • insects
  • Plant Foods
  • leaves
  • roots and tubers
  • wood, bark, or stems
  • seeds, grains, and nuts
  • fruit
  • Other Foods
  • fungus

Predation

Meadow voles have a very wide range of predators. Most carnivorous animals that inhabit the same areas as these voles prey on them. Their most common predators include owls, hawks, red foxes Vulpes vulpes, coyotes Canis latrans, bobcats Lynx rufus, and snakes. Northern short-tailed shrews Blarina brevicauda are a major predator of meadow voles in the eastern portions of North America. Black bears Ursus americanus and brown bears Ursus arctos have been known to scavenge for these rodents as well. Other mammals known to prey on meadow voles include grey wolves Canis lupus, fishers Martes pennanti, skunks, and ringtails Bassariscus astutus. Various birds such as jaegers Stercorarius, shrikes Lanius, and gulls also are predators of these rodents. (Elbroch and Rinehart, 2011; Naughton, 2012; Reich, 1981)

Meadow voles create tunnels both above and slightly below the ground. These tunnels are built under vegetation and used for protection against their many predators. (Elbroch and Rinehart, 2011; Naughton, 2012)

Ecosystem Roles

Meadow voles are hosts to many endo- and ecto-parasites. Durden (1992) found 12 parasitic arthropods on meadow voles in Fort Detrick, MD. These arthropods included species of lice Hoplopleura acanthopus, fleas (Ctenophthalmus pseudagyrtes, Orghopeas leucopus), mites (Androlaelaps casalis, Androlaelapes fahrenholzi, Haemogamasus liponyssoides, Laelaps alaskensis, Laelaps kochi, Listrophorus mexicanus, Ornithonyssus bacoti), American dog ticks Dermacentor variabilis, and chiggers Neotrombicula whartoni. Other parasitic species groups include trematodes, cestodes, nematodes, acanthocephalans, and members of the phyla Anoplura and Acarina and order Diptera. In Pennsylvania, Holland and Benton (1953) found additional species of fleas (Epitedia wenmanni wenmanni, Catallagia borealis, Ctenophthalmus pseudagyrtes pseudagyrtes, Megabothris asio asio, Nosopsyllus fasciatus, Opisodasys pseudarctomys, Peromyscopsylla hamifer hamifer, Peromyscopsylla catatina) hosted by meadow voles. Meadow voles help with plant succession to contribute to biodiversity in ecosystems. These voles are also an important source of food for many other animals. (Holland and Benton, 1968; Jackson, 1961; Pearson, 2000; Reich, 1981)

Commensal/Parasitic Species

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

There are no known direct positive economic effects of meadow voles.

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

Meadow voles are considered agricultural pests. Prevalent damage occurs during times of dense populations. They destroy many crops including alfalfa Medicago sativa, artichokes Cynara cardunculus, Brussels sprouts (Gemmifera group Brassica oleracea), carrots Daucus carota, cauliflower (Botrytis cultivar group Brassica oleracea), potatoes Solanum tuberosum, sugar beets Beta vulgaris, and tomatoes Solanum lycopersicum. These voles can damage fields of wheat Triticum and grain (Poaceae), and harm trees in orchards. (Clark, 1984; Jackson, 1961; Reich, 1981)

  • Negative Impacts
  • crop pest

Conservation Status

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species lists meadow voles as a species of “least concern.” Meadow voles are abundant throughout their range and have no major threats. Because these voles cause damage to agriculture, there are anti-conservation measures to try and control their abundance. Controlling weed growth, lethal removal via snap-traps, and poison baiting are all used to reduce populations of meadow voles, and reduce damage to crops. Meadow voles have no special status on the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Endangered Species Database (US Federal List), Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), or the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (State of Michigan List). (Clark, 1984; Linzey and Hammerson, 2008)

Contributors

Stephanie Rowe (author), Radford University, Alex Atwood (editor), Radford University, Marisa Dameron (editor), Radford University, Karen Powers (editor), Radford University, Tanya Dewey (editor), University of Michigan-Ann Arbor.

Glossary

Nearctic

living in the Nearctic biogeographic province, the northern part of the New World. This includes Greenland, the Canadian Arctic islands, and all of the North American as far south as the highlands of central Mexico.

World Map

acoustic

uses sound to communicate

agricultural

living in landscapes dominated by human agriculture.

altricial

young are born in a relatively underdeveloped state; they are unable to feed or care for themselves or locomote independently for a period of time after birth/hatching. In birds, naked and helpless after hatching.

bilateral symmetry

having body symmetry such that the animal can be divided in one plane into two mirror-image halves. Animals with bilateral symmetry have dorsal and ventral sides, as well as anterior and posterior ends. Synapomorphy of the Bilateria.

bog

a wetland area rich in accumulated plant material and with acidic soils surrounding a body of open water. Bogs have a flora dominated by sedges, heaths, and sphagnum.

chemical

uses smells or other chemicals to communicate

diurnal
  1. active during the day, 2. lasting for one day.
endothermic

animals that use metabolically generated heat to regulate body temperature independently of ambient temperature. Endothermy is a synapomorphy of the Mammalia, although it may have arisen in a (now extinct) synapsid ancestor; the fossil record does not distinguish these possibilities. Convergent in birds.

female parental care

parental care is carried out by females

folivore

an animal that mainly eats leaves.

forest

forest biomes are dominated by trees, otherwise forest biomes can vary widely in amount of precipitation and seasonality.

fossorial

Referring to a burrowing life-style or behavior, specialized for digging or burrowing.

frugivore

an animal that mainly eats fruit

granivore

an animal that mainly eats seeds

herbivore

An animal that eats mainly plants or parts of plants.

induced ovulation

ovulation is stimulated by the act of copulation (does not occur spontaneously)

iteroparous

offspring are produced in more than one group (litters, clutches, etc.) and across multiple seasons (or other periods hospitable to reproduction). Iteroparous animals must, by definition, survive over multiple seasons (or periodic condition changes).

marsh

marshes are wetland areas often dominated by grasses and reeds.

motile

having the capacity to move from one place to another.

native range

the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.

nocturnal

active during the night

pheromones

chemicals released into air or water that are detected by and responded to by other animals of the same species

polygynandrous

the kind of polygamy in which a female pairs with several males, each of which also pairs with several different females.

scent marks

communicates by producing scents from special gland(s) and placing them on a surface whether others can smell or taste them

seasonal breeding

breeding is confined to a particular season

sedentary

remains in the same area

sexual

reproduction that includes combining the genetic contribution of two individuals, a male and a female

solitary

lives alone

tactile

uses touch to communicate

temperate

that region of the Earth between 23.5 degrees North and 60 degrees North (between the Tropic of Cancer and the Arctic Circle) and between 23.5 degrees South and 60 degrees South (between the Tropic of Capricorn and the Antarctic Circle).

terrestrial

Living on the ground.

territorial

defends an area within the home range, occupied by a single animals or group of animals of the same species and held through overt defense, display, or advertisement

tropical savanna and grassland

A terrestrial biome. Savannas are grasslands with scattered individual trees that do not form a closed canopy. Extensive savannas are found in parts of subtropical and tropical Africa and South America, and in Australia.

savanna

A grassland with scattered trees or scattered clumps of trees, a type of community intermediate between grassland and forest. See also Tropical savanna and grassland biome.

temperate grassland

A terrestrial biome found in temperate latitudes (>23.5° N or S latitude). Vegetation is made up mostly of grasses, the height and species diversity of which depend largely on the amount of moisture available. Fire and grazing are important in the long-term maintenance of grasslands.

ultrasound

uses sound above the range of human hearing for either navigation or communication or both

visual

uses sight to communicate

viviparous

reproduction in which fertilization and development take place within the female body and the developing embryo derives nourishment from the female.

year-round breeding

breeding takes place throughout the year

References

Barry, R. 1976. Mucosal surface areas and villous morphology of the small intestine of small mammals: Functional interpretations. Journal of Mammalogy, 57/2: 273-290.

Blake, B. 2012. Ultrasonic calling in 2 species of voles, Microtus pinetorum and M. pennsylvanicus, with different social system. Journal of Mammalogy, 93/4: 1051-1060.

Boonstra, R., X. Xia, L. Pavone. 1993. Mating system of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behavioral Ecology, 4/1: 83-89.

Clark, J. 1984. Vole control in field crops. Proceedings of the Eleventh Vertebrate Pest Conference, Paper 9: 5-6.

Dietloff, J., M. Falcy, J. Krenz, B. McMillan. 2010. Correlating small mammal abundance to climatic variation over twenty years. Journal of Mammalogy, 91/1: 193-199.

Elbroch, M., K. Rinehart. 2011. Behavior of North American Mammals. New York, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Ferkin, M., R. Johnston. 1995. Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, use multiple sources of scent for sex recognition. Animal Behaviour, 49/1: 37-44.

Ford, W., J. Rodrigue, J. Laerm. 2007. Meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Pp. 284-288 in M Trani, W Ford, B Chapman, eds. The Land Manager's Guide to Mammals of the South. Durham, North Carolina: USDA Forest Service & The Nature Conservancy.

Francl, K., W. Ford, S. Castleberry, T. Glenn. 2008. Genetic relationships of meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) populations in central Appalachian wetlands. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 86/5: 344-355.

Grant, P. 1971. The habitat preference of Microtus pennsylvanicus, and its relevance to the distribution of this species on islands. Journal of Mammalogy, 52/2: 351-361.

Gruder-Adams, S., L. Getz. 1985. Comparison of the mating system and paternal behavior in Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus. Journal of Mammalogy, 66/1: 165-167.

Holland, G., A. Benton. 1968. Siphonaptera from Pennsylvania mammals. The American Midland Naturalist, 80/1: 252-261.

Jackson, H. 1961. Mammals of Wisconsin. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Klatt, B., L. Getz, B. McGuire. 2015. Interspecific interactions and habitat use by prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and meadow voles (M. pennsylvanicus). The American Midland Naturalist, 173/2: 241-252.

Linzey, A., G. Hammerson. 2008. "Microtus pennsylvanicus" (On-line). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T13452A3970160. Accessed September 15, 2016 at http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T13452A3970160.en.

Lomolino, M. 1984. Immigrant selection, predation, and the distributions of Microtus pennsylvanicus and Blarina brevicauda on islands. The American Naturalist, 123/4: 468-483.

Madison, D. 1978. Behavioral and sociochemical susceptibility of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) to snake predators. The American Midland Naturalist, 100/1: 23-28.

McGuire, B., M. Novak. 1984. A comparison of maternal behaviour in the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), prairie vole (M. ochrogaster) and pine vole (M. pinetorum). Animal Behaviour, 32/4: 1132-1141.

Naughton, D. 2012. The Natural History of Canadian Mammals. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

Pearson, D. 2000. Small mammals of the Bitterroot National Forest: Ecological significance and guidelines for management. Pp. 45-47 in H Smith, ed. The Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project: What We Have Learned. Missoula, Montana: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

Reich, L. 1981. Microtus pennsylvanicus. Mammalian Species, 159: 1-8.

Sabau, R., M. Ferkin. 2013. Food restriction affects the maternal behavior provided by female meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Journal of Mammalogy, 94/5: 1068-1076.

Thompson, D. 1965. Food preferences of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in relation to habitat affinities. The American Midland Naturalist, 74/1: 76-86.

Unangst, E., B. Wunder. 2004. Effect of supplemental high-fat forage on body composition in wild meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). The American Midland Naturalist, 151/1: 146-153.

Vlautin, C., M. Ferkin. 2013. The outcome of a previous social interaction with a same-sex conspecific affects the behavior of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ethology International Journal of Behavioural Biology, 119/3: 212-220.

Zimmerman, E. 1965. A comparison of habitat and food of two species of Microtus. Journal of Mammalogy, 46/4: 605-612.