Geographic Range
Great woolly horseshoe bats (
Rhinolophus luctus
) are distributed throughout South and South-East Asia. Their range extends north
into southern China, west into India, and as far south as the island of Java.
- Biogeographic Regions
- palearctic
- oriental
Habitat
Woolly horseshoe bats primarily live in caves and in tropical to subtropical forests
among foliage or in tree cavities. Less commonly,
R. luctus
may be found roosting between rocks in mountain ranges up to 1600 m, in tunnels,
and under tree bark. Additionally, while they generally roost away from human activity,
they have been found in fragmented forests and abandoned human structures such as
mine shafts. Agricultural land is an unsuitable habitat for
R. luctus
.
The differences between the
R. luctus
subspecies lie primarily in their ranges.
R. l. foetidus
is found on the island of Borneo;
R. l. lanosus
is found in the Fukien province of China;
R. l. luctus
is found on the island of Java, Singapore, and Tenasserim;
R. l. morio
is found throughout the Malay Peninsula;
R. l. perniger
is found in Burma and Nepal; and
R. l. spurcus
is found on the island of Hainan.
- Habitat Regions
- temperate
- tropical
- terrestrial
- Other Habitat Features
- suburban
- caves
Physical Description
Like all
horseshoe bats
,
Rhinolophus luctus
has a complex nose-leaf that covers the upper lip and surrounds the nostrils. Specifically,
woolly horseshoe bats have a broad sella and trifoliate nose-leaf. Their large ears
(between 38 and 42 mm) and black-to-brown woolly fur set them apart from other
Rhinolophus
species. Additionally, their dental formula is I1/2 C1/1 P2/3 M3/3.
Woolly horseshoe bats are the largest species of
horseshoe bat
, with adults weighing between 22.3 and 33.9 g. Their bodies are 80 to 99 mm long
and their tail length ranges from 46 to 59 mm. The wingspan of these animals has not
been evaluated. Female-biased sexual dimorphism is present in the body mass and forearm
length. On average, females weigh 27.81 g and their forearms are 67.77 mm in length
whereas males weigh 22.29 g and have 63.27 mm long forearms.
The six subspecies of
R. luctus
vary slightly in relative skull width (zygomatic width:mandible length) and relative
length of lower tooth row (lower CM3 length:mandible length). In terms of the relative
skull width,
R. l. lanosus
(0.64) is the smallest followed by
R. l. perniger
(0.68-0.70),
R. l. foetidus
(0.72),
R. l. spurcus
(O.72),
R. l. morio
(0.74), and
R. l. luctus
(0.78). In terms of the relative length of the lower tooth row,
R. l. lanosus
(0.54) is the smallest followed by
R. l. spurcus
(0.56),
R. l. morio
(0.57),
R. l. perniger
(0.57-0.58),
R. l. foetidus
(0.58), and
R. l. luctus
(0.63).
- Other Physical Features
- endothermic
- bilateral symmetry
- Sexual Dimorphism
- female larger
Reproduction
Unlike the polygynous mating system of other
horseshoe bats
, woolly horseshoe bats are monogamous. Additionally, females show strong sexual selection
on male echolocation frequency and weak sexual selection on male body size.
- Mating System
- monogamous
While there is little available information on the breeding cycles of
R. luctus
specifically, it is unlikely that they differ from the non-synchronous monoestry
that is present in other
horseshoe bats
. However, one species description found a fetus in the advanced stage (10 g in weight)
in the uterine horn of an individual woolly horseshoe bat that indicated a June parturition.
Due to a lack of information, the following is an extrapolation to woolly horseshoe
bats based on shared characteristics within their family.
Horseshoe bats
typically have delayed fertilization or implantation of only one embryo once a year
in spring with a gestation period of approximately 7 weeks. In the similar-sized
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
, lactation lasts for up to 45 days. Finally,
horseshoe bats
reach sexual maturity at approximately 2 years of age.
- Key Reproductive Features
- iteroparous
- seasonal breeding
- gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate)
- sexual
- fertilization
- viviparous
- delayed fertilization
- delayed implantation
Woolly horseshoe bats are born in an altricial state and although there are no documented
cases of parental care, they provide maternal care in the form of lactation (up to
45 days in the similar-sized
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
). In addition to the two functional teats on the abdomen, woolly horseshoe bats have
two additional dummy teats that are not connected to mammary glands. Juveniles wrap
their legs around their mother's neck and attach to one of these dummy teats with
their mouths during flight.
- Parental Investment
- altricial
- female parental care
-
pre-weaning/fledging
-
provisioning
- female
-
provisioning
Lifespan/Longevity
There is no data on the specific lifespan of woolly horseshoe bats.
Behavior
Great woolly horseshoe bats roost in monogamous pairs or solitarily. Additionally,
in these monogamous pairs, individuals do not roost touching the other and do not
share their roosts with any other species. Finally, these bats are found at very low
densities which makes it difficult to accurately assess population sizes.
There is insufficient information about the specific activity of woolly horseshoe
bats, but
horseshoe bats
generally are all nocturnal and forage solitarily later in the night than other
bats
. Additionally,
Rhinolophus luctus
can enter a deep torpor, but hibernation has not been assessed.
Home Range
There is no data on the specific home range of woolly horseshoe bats.
Communication and Perception
The woolly horseshoe bat's small and partially obscured eyes combined with frequent
cave roosts suggests that vision may not be an important sense. Echolocation has been
directly observed in
R. luctus
, ranging from 32 to 43 Hz and which exhibits a positive relationship with the body
size among the subspecies.
- Perception Channels
- visual
- tactile
- acoustic
- ultrasound
- echolocation
- chemical
Food Habits
Great woolly horseshoe bats are insectivorous, feeding primarily on
beetles
and
termites
, and secondarily on other insects. While feeding habits of
R. luctus
is understudied,
Rhinolophid
bats typically use slow maneuverable flight in combination with their echolocation
to locate and capture prey in a gleaning (hunting grounded prey) or aerial hawking
(catching flying prey) fashion. It is possible that
R. luctus
hunts in the same way.
- Primary Diet
- carnivore
- Animal Foods
- insects
Predation
No specific information on the predation of
R. luctus
is available. However, they likely are depredated by the same predators of
bats
in general, like
owls
,
hawks
, and
snakes
. Furthermore, it is possible that woolly horseshoe bats' thick black fur could function
as a form of crypsis, especially in their roosts.
- Anti-predator Adaptations
- cryptic
Ecosystem Roles
Great woolly horseshoe bats are insectivorous and consume
beetles
,
termites
, and other
insects
and thus negatively impact these populations. There is little information on these
bats, but generally
bats
are not a primary prey group for many predators, but
owls
and
snakes
are known to depredate them. Additionally,
bats
also carry parasites such as
mites
,
trematodes
, and
fleas
, and there are no plausible reasons that woolly horseshoe bats would differ from
this trend. Furthermore,
Rhinolophus luctus
has been shown to be a possible reservoir host for some economically important diseases
such as Nipah virus and SARS-like coronavirus.
- Fleas: Siphonaptera
- Mites: Acari
- Trematodes: Trematoda
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
There are no positive human economic roles for
R. luctus
aside from being one of the species hunted for usage in Indian and Chinese Traditional
Medicine. A drawback of these bats' rarity and solitary or paired roosting behavior
is that they are not likely to significantly contribute to
insect
control.
- Positive Impacts
- source of medicine or drug
Economic Importance for Humans: Negative
There are no major negative economic impacts on humans documented for R. luctus . A benefit of these bats' rarity and solitary or paired roosting behavior is that they are not likely to become a pest species in human developments.
It is worth noting, however, that
R. luctus
has been identified as a potential reservoir host for Nipah virus and SARS-like coronavirus,
although their solitary nature, insectivorous diet, and usual avoidance of agricultural
developments make the risk of zoonotic transmission low.
- Negative Impacts
-
injures humans
- carries human disease
- causes or carries domestic animal disease
Conservation Status
Woolly horseshoe bat populations might be declining but not at a rate sufficient to
put them into a more protected category. Deforestation and hunting are not a significant
threat due to their tolerance of anthropological disturbance and wide range. Additionally,
R. luctus
resides in many protected regions such as Satpura National Park (India) and Vu Quang
National Park (Vietnam). However, despite listing woolly horseshoe bats as Least Concern,
the IUCN Red List recommends an increase in population studies and ecological monitoring.
Other Comments
Subspecies of the great woolly horseshoe bat include
Rhinolophus luctus foetidus
,
R. l. lanosus
,
R. l. luctus
,
R. l. morio
,
R. l. perniger
(most common), and
R. l. spurcus
. Older sources may refer to
Rhinolopus luctus
as
Rhinolophus perniger
and
Rhinolophus lanosus
(now both are classified as subspecies), or
Rhinolophus geminus
. However, the taxonomy remains unresolved and in need of study. For example,
R. l. morio
has been called to be elevated to the species rank due to a Y-autosomal translocation
and skull variations.
Additional Links
Contributors
Codey Dueck (author), University of Manitoba, Annemarie van der Marel (editor), University of Manitoba, Genevieve Barnett (editor), Colorado State University.
- Palearctic
-
living in the northern part of the Old World. In otherwords, Europe and Asia and northern Africa.
- native range
-
the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.
- oriental
-
found in the oriental region of the world. In other words, India and southeast Asia.
- native range
-
the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.
- temperate
-
that region of the Earth between 23.5 degrees North and 60 degrees North (between the Tropic of Cancer and the Arctic Circle) and between 23.5 degrees South and 60 degrees South (between the Tropic of Capricorn and the Antarctic Circle).
- tropical
-
the region of the earth that surrounds the equator, from 23.5 degrees north to 23.5 degrees south.
- terrestrial
-
Living on the ground.
- forest
-
forest biomes are dominated by trees, otherwise forest biomes can vary widely in amount of precipitation and seasonality.
- mountains
-
This terrestrial biome includes summits of high mountains, either without vegetation or covered by low, tundra-like vegetation.
- suburban
-
living in residential areas on the outskirts of large cities or towns.
- monogamous
-
Having one mate at a time.
- iteroparous
-
offspring are produced in more than one group (litters, clutches, etc.) and across multiple seasons (or other periods hospitable to reproduction). Iteroparous animals must, by definition, survive over multiple seasons (or periodic condition changes).
- seasonal breeding
-
breeding is confined to a particular season
- sexual
-
reproduction that includes combining the genetic contribution of two individuals, a male and a female
- fertilization
-
union of egg and spermatozoan
- viviparous
-
reproduction in which fertilization and development take place within the female body and the developing embryo derives nourishment from the female.
- delayed fertilization
-
a substantial delay (longer than the minimum time required for sperm to travel to the egg) takes place between copulation and fertilization, used to describe female sperm storage.
- delayed implantation
-
in mammals, a condition in which a fertilized egg reaches the uterus but delays its implantation in the uterine lining, sometimes for several months.
- altricial
-
young are born in a relatively underdeveloped state; they are unable to feed or care for themselves or locomote independently for a period of time after birth/hatching. In birds, naked and helpless after hatching.
- female parental care
-
parental care is carried out by females
- nocturnal
-
active during the night
- motile
-
having the capacity to move from one place to another.
- solitary
-
lives alone
- tactile
-
uses touch to communicate
- acoustic
-
uses sound to communicate
- visual
-
uses sight to communicate
- tactile
-
uses touch to communicate
- acoustic
-
uses sound to communicate
- ultrasound
-
uses sound above the range of human hearing for either navigation or communication or both
- echolocation
-
The process by which an animal locates itself with respect to other animals and objects by emitting sound waves and sensing the pattern of the reflected sound waves.
- chemical
-
uses smells or other chemicals to communicate
- cryptic
-
having markings, coloration, shapes, or other features that cause an animal to be camouflaged in its natural environment; being difficult to see or otherwise detect.
- drug
-
a substance used for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease
- causes or carries domestic animal disease
-
either directly causes, or indirectly transmits, a disease to a domestic animal
- carnivore
-
an animal that mainly eats meat
- insectivore
-
An animal that eats mainly insects or spiders.
- endothermic
-
animals that use metabolically generated heat to regulate body temperature independently of ambient temperature. Endothermy is a synapomorphy of the Mammalia, although it may have arisen in a (now extinct) synapsid ancestor; the fossil record does not distinguish these possibilities. Convergent in birds.
- bilateral symmetry
-
having body symmetry such that the animal can be divided in one plane into two mirror-image halves. Animals with bilateral symmetry have dorsal and ventral sides, as well as anterior and posterior ends. Synapomorphy of the Bilateria.
References
Andersen, K. 1918. Diagnoses of new bats of the families Rhinolophidae and Megadermatidae. Pp. 374-383 in The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany, and Geology, 9th ser. , Vol. 2, no. 10. London: Taylor and Francis. Accessed January 02, 2020 at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15631095 .
Baniya, S., B. Sharma, C. Khanal, N. Raut, P. Acharya. 2019. Record of Great Woolly Horseshoe Bat ( Rhinolophus luctus , Temmick 1834) in Western Nepal. Journal of Bat Research & Conservation , 12/1: 1-6.
Bates, P., D. Harrison. 1997. Bats of the Indian Subcontinent . Sevenoaks, England, UK: Harrison Zoological Museum.
Bates, P., M. Thi, T. Nwe, S. Bu, K. Mie, N. Nyo, A. Khaing, N. Aye, T. Oo, I. Mackie. 2004. A Review of Rhinolophus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from Myanmar, Including Three Species New to the Country. Acta Chiropterologica , 6/1: 23-48.
Borissenko, A., S. Kruskop. 2003. Bats of Vietnam and adjacent territories. An identification manual . Moscow, Russia: Geos.
Corbet, G., J. Hill. 1992. Mammals of the Indo-Malayan Region: a Systematic Review . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ellerman, J., T. Morrison-Scott. 1951. Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals 1758 to 1946 . London, UK: British Museum (Natural History).
Gopalakrishna, A., N. Badwaik. 1990. Vascularisation of the placenta in some bats. Proceedings: Animal Sciences , 99/4: 289-303. Accessed October 01, 2019 at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03186398 .
Hill, J., J. Smith. 1984. Bats: A Natural History . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Klaus-Gerhard, H., M. Volleth. 1995. Community Structure and Evolution of Insectivorous Bats in the Palaeotropics and Neotropics. Journal of Tropical Ecology , 11/3: 429-442.
Koopman, K. 1993. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 137-241 in Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference . Washington, D. C., USA: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Krutzsch, P., E. Crichton. 2000. Reproductive Biology of Bats . San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Lim, L., A. Mohd-Adnan, A. Zubaid, M. Struebig, S. Rossiter. 2014. Diversity of Malaysian insectivorous bat assemblages revisited. Journal of Tropical Ecology , 30/2: 111-121. Accessed October 10, 2019 at https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266467413000874/type/journal_article .
MacDonald, D. 2006. The Encyclopedia of Mammals Volume II . New York, New York: Facts on File, Inc..
Molur, S., G. Marimuthu, C. Srinivasulu, S. Mistry, A. Hutson, P. Bates, S. Walker, K. Padmapriya, A. Binupriya. 2002. Status of South Asian Chiroptera : Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (C.A.M.P.) Workshop report . Coimbatore, India: Zoo Outreach Organization/CBSG-South Asia.
Plowright, R., D. Becker, D. Crowley, A. Washburne, T. Huang, P. Nameer, E. Gurley, B. Han. 2019. Prioritizing surveillance of Nipah virus in India. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases , 13/6: 1-17. Accessed October 10, 2019 at http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007393 .
Riccucci, M. 2016. Bats as materia medica: an ethnomedical review and implications for conservation. Vespertilio , 16: 249-270.
Saikia, U., R. Sharma, V. Mattu. 2004. New Records of Bats from Himachal Pradesh with some Ecological Notes. Indian Forester , 130/10: 1204-1208.
Simmons, N. 2005. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 312-529 in Mammal Species of the World 3rd Edition . Baltimore, MD, USA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Srinivasulu, C., B. Srinivasulu, Y. Sinha. 2012. Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of South Asia: Biogeography, diversity, taxonomy and distribution . New York, New York, USA: Springer.
Tang, X., J. Zhang, S. Zhang, P. Wang, X. Fan, L. Li, G. Li, B. Dong, W. Liu, C. Cheung, K. Xu, W. Song, D. Vijaykrishna, L. Poon, J. Peiris, G. Smith, H. Chen, Y. Guan. 2006. Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of Coronaviruses in Bats from China. Journal of Virology , 80/15: 7481-7490.
Thi, M., T. Nwe, S. Bu, K. Mie, N. Nyo, A. Khaing, N. Aye, T. Oo, I. Mackie. 2004. A review of Rhinolophus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from Myanmar, including three species new to the country. Acta Chiropterologica , 6/1: 23-48.
Topal, G., G. Csorba. 1992. The subspecific division of Rhinolophus luctus Temminck, 1835, and the taxonomic status of Rhinolophus beddomei Anderson, 1905 (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Miscellanea Zoologica Hungarica , 7: 101-116.
Volleth, M., J. Loidl, F. Mayer, H. Yong, S. Muller, K. Heller. 2015. Surprising genetic diversity in Rhinolophus luctus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from Peninsular Malaysia: description of a new species based on genetic and morphological characters. Acta Chiropterologica , 17/1: 1-20.
Walker, E. 1975. Mammals of the World Volume I - 3rd Edition . Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press.
Walston, J., T. Kingston, A. Hutson. 2008. " Rhinolophus luctus " (On-line). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Accessed October 05, 2019 at https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/19548/8972416 .
Wordley, C., M. Sankaran, D. Mudappa, J. Altringham. 2015. Landscape scale habitat suitability modelling of bats in the Western Ghats of India: Bats like something in their tea. Biological Conservation , 191: 529-536.
Wu, H., T. Jiang, X. Huang, J. Feng. 2018. Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in horseshoe bats: Testing Rensch’s rule and potential causes. Scientific Reports , 8/1: 2616. Accessed October 10, 2019 at http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-21077-7 .
2019. " Rhinolophus luctus " (On-line). Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Accessed October 10, 2019 at https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=631440#null .